When choosing a portable power station in the mid-range segment, two standout models are the Anker 535 vs Bluetti EB55. Both deliver reliable performance, compact portability, and enough power to handle everything from camping to emergency backup.
But which one truly offers the best value for your power needs? In this comprehensive comparison, we evaluate their strengths and differences across all major categories to determine which model reigns supreme.
Contents
Differences Anker 535 vs Bluetti EB55
Below is a summary of the specifications:
Battery Capacity, Expandability, and Battery Lifespan
The Bluetti EB55 has a slight edge in capacity with 537Wh, compared to the 512Wh offered by the Anker 535. While the difference of 25Wh may not translate into a dramatic increase in runtime, it does offer a bit more headroom for extended use.
Both units rely on LiFePO₄ battery chemistry, ensuring safety, efficiency, and long-term durability. However, the Anker 535 leads in cycle life with 3,000+ cycles to 80%, compared to 2,500+ cycles for the EB55. Neither device supports capacity expansion, so what you buy is what you’re locked into.
Winner: Anker 535
While Bluetti has a slightly higher capacity, Anker’s superior battery longevity offers more value over time.
Power Output and Device Compatibility
The Bluetti EB55 shines in this category, providing 700W continuous power and 1,400W surge, allowing it to handle heavier-duty appliances like mini-fridges, small power tools, and even electric cooktops for short durations.
In contrast, the Anker 535 delivers 500W with 750W surge, which is more limited and best suited for basic electronics, laptops, small fans, and lighting setups. It’s ideal for everyday use but won’t handle high-wattage loads as well as Bluetti.
Winner: Bluetti EB55
More powerful AC output and a higher surge threshold make Bluetti the better option for appliance compatibility.
Charging Speed and Solar Input
The Bluetti EB55 comes equipped with dual charging capability, allowing it to charge via AC and solar simultaneously. It supports up to 200W AC charging, reaching 80% in approximately two hours, and also allows 200W solar input, which is excellent for outdoor recharging.
The Anker 535, on the other hand, is limited to 120W AC input, needing around 4 hours to fully recharge. It also supports 120W solar input, which is slower in off-grid situations.
Winner: Bluetti EB55
Faster charging and better solar performance offer more flexibility for both indoor and outdoor users.
Ports and Output Variety
The Anker 535 offers one 60W USB-C, three USB-A ports, four AC outlets, a 12V car port, and a DC5525 port, supporting a wide array of devices.
The Bluetti EB55 provides one 100W USB-C port, four USB-A ports, four AC outlets, a car port, two DC5521 ports, and even a wireless charging pad on top, which is extremely convenient for charging smartphones and wireless earbuds.
Winner: Bluetti EB55
It has more output ports, higher-wattage USB-C charging, and a wireless pad—ideal for powering multiple devices at once.
Portability and Weight
Both units are nearly identical in size and weight, with the Bluetti EB55 weighing 16.5 lbs and the Anker 535 slightly heavier at 16.75 lbs. Their compact designs make them suitable for road trips, camping, or mobile work setups.
While neither is ultralight, they’re both manageable for most adults to carry with one hand.
Winner: Bluetti EB55
Slightly lighter and more compact, giving it a minor advantage in portability.
Connectivity and Smart Features
Neither the Anker 535 nor the Bluetti EB55 offers smart features like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or app integration. This lack of connectivity may not be a dealbreaker for all users, but those looking for remote monitoring or smart control will need to look at more premium models.
Winner: Tie
Neither unit offers connectivity, keeping things simple and reliable.
Quick Rundown Of Anker 535
Quick Rundown Of Bluetti EB55
Conclusion
The Anker 535 is an outstanding choice for users who prioritize battery longevity and consistent reliability. It’s ideal for day-to-day use, small electronics, and users who want a power station that lasts for years.
On the other hand, the Bluetti EB55 dominates in power output, port variety, charging speed, and solar flexibility. For users who plan to power more demanding devices, recharge quickly in off-grid conditions, and utilize wireless charging, the EB55 offers better overall functionality.
Overall Winner: Bluetti EB55
With stronger power delivery, faster charging, and a more versatile interface, the Bluetti EB55 emerges as the better all-around portable power station in this head-to-head matchup.