In the rapidly evolving landscape of portable energy solutions, both the Anker Solix C300 vs Bluetti AC2A emerge as advanced, compact power stations for users who prioritize efficiency, portability, and modern charging capabilities.
Whether you’re powering small devices on a weekend trip or preparing a lightweight backup solution for essential home gadgets, these two models are often compared due to their compact form and smart technology integration. In this comprehensive comparison, we delve into every important aspect to determine which one offers superior value for your needs.
Differences Anker Solix C300 vs Bluetti AC2A
Below is a summary of the specifications:
Battery Capacity, Expandability, and Battery Lifespan
The Anker Solix C300 boasts a 299Wh LFP battery, offering a slight advantage over the 204.8Wh LFP battery found in the Bluetti AC2A. Both models use LiFePO₄ chemistry, ensuring exceptional thermal stability, safety, and durability. With 3,000+ charge cycles to 80%, both power stations promise long-term reliability.
However, neither model supports expandable capacity, which is common for ultra-compact units in this category. This makes them best suited for powering small devices such as smartphones, cameras, routers, or LED lights rather than large appliances or off-grid setups.
Winner: Anker Solix C300
With more usable capacity, it offers extended runtime within the same compact form factor.
Power Output and Device Compatibility
Both the Anker Solix C300 and Bluetti AC2A deliver 300W continuous AC output with 600W surge capability, which is ideal for running low to medium-power devices. This output range allows both models to support essentials like laptops, CPAP machines, drones, or even small fans simultaneously.
There’s no difference in the number of AC outlets or their capabilities. For those needing to power more demanding tools or multiple devices at once, these compact units might fall short, but for their intended use, the performance is on par.
Winner: Tie
Both models offer the same AC output and surge rating, making them equally capable for compact tasks.
Charging Speed and Solar Input
Charging speed is where both power stations shine. The Anker Solix C300 charges via AC at 270W, reaching 100% in about 1.8 hours, while the Bluetti AC2A, despite having a smaller battery, also charges at 270W but tops up slightly faster in 1.4 hours.
However, the real distinction comes from their solar input support. The Bluetti AC2A can accept up to 200W solar input, compared to the 100W limit on the Anker Solix C300. This allows faster recharging in off-grid situations, giving the AC2A a stronger edge for solar-reliant setups.
Winner: Bluetti AC2A
Faster full charge time and higher solar input make it a better performer for off-grid recharging.
Ports and Output Variety
The Anker Solix C300 offers 1 USB-C port rated at 100W, 2 USB-A ports, a car socket, and two AC outlets. The Bluetti AC2A matches this setup with 1 USB-C port (also 100W), 2 USB-A ports, a car socket, and two AC outlets as well.
In real-world use, this means both power stations can charge a laptop, phone, and other essentials simultaneously. The inclusion of a high-speed 100W USB-C port on both units is a key highlight, ensuring fast charging for modern laptops and tablets.
Winner: Tie
Identical port options provide similar convenience and flexibility.
Portability and Weight
Weight and size are critical in this category, especially for campers, digital nomads, and travelers. The Anker Solix C300 weighs 3.7 kg (8.2 lbs), slightly heavier than the Bluetti AC2A, which weighs 3.6 kg (7.9 lbs). The AC2A is also more compact in terms of volume, making it a bit easier to pack or carry.
However, the difference is minimal and unlikely to impact usability in practice. Both are ultra-portable, cabin-friendly units built for grab-and-go convenience.
Winner: Bluetti AC2A – Marginally lighter and more compact.
Connectivity and Smart Features
Both devices come equipped with Bluetooth app control, giving users remote access to monitor power levels, turn ports on/off, and manage settings. The apps are user-friendly and enable real-time insights into power consumption and remaining runtime.
Neither product includes Wi-Fi connectivity or advanced automation features, but the inclusion of Bluetooth in such small devices is impressive and useful for day-to-day management.
Winner: Tie – Both offer modern app connectivity for remote monitoring and control.
Quick Rundown Of Anker Solix C300
Quick Rundown Of Bluetti AC2A
Conclusion
When comparing the Anker Solix C300 and the Bluetti AC2A, both deliver remarkable value for their size, offering LiFePO₄ durability, fast charging, and app-based smart control. The Anker Solix C300 takes the lead in battery capacity, making it more suitable for users needing extended power without recharging. However, the Bluetti AC2A comes back strong with faster solar charging, slightly quicker AC recharge times, and a more compact form, giving it the upper hand for lightweight travel and solar-based setups.
If your priority is maximum runtime in a compact form, the Anker Solix C300 is the better choice. But if you’re looking for faster off-grid charging and portability, the Bluetti AC2A is a standout winner.
Overall Winner: Bluetti AC2A
Slightly more versatile thanks to superior charging options and compact design.