For users who want reliable off-grid energy without the bulk of large solar generators, mid-range portable power stations like the Jackery Explorer 500 vs Bluetti EB55 present compelling solutions. Both deliver enough capacity and output to support camping, van life, power outages, or remote work scenarios.
However, while they share similar goals, these two power stations take different paths in design, features, and performance. In this detailed comparison, we break down every essential category to determine which product is the better investment.
Contents
Differences Jackery Explorer 500 vs Bluetti EB55
Below is a summary of the specifications:
Battery Capacity, Chemistry, and Lifespan
The Jackery Explorer 500 provides a 518Wh capacity using NMC battery chemistry, which is known for its compact form and energy density. However, it’s rated for only 500+ charge cycles, which means users who regularly cycle their power station may experience noticeable battery degradation in just a couple of years.
The Bluetti EB55, on the other hand, features a slightly higher 537Wh capacity and leverages LiFePO₄ (LFP) chemistry, rated for 2,500+ charge cycles to 80% capacity. This means the EB55 will maintain a high level of performance for significantly longer, making it the better long-term investment. LFP batteries are also more stable thermally, offering enhanced safety under stress or high temperatures.
Winner: Bluetti EB55
With better battery chemistry, greater lifespan, and slightly more usable capacity, Bluetti clearly leads this category.

Power Output and Supported Devices
The Bluetti EB55 delivers 700W of continuous AC power with a 1,400W surge, far outperforming the 500W/1,000W output of the Jackery Explorer 500. This extra headroom is crucial when powering devices with higher startup wattage or when running multiple appliances simultaneously. The EB55 includes four pure sine wave AC outlets, giving users much more flexibility to plug in various devices without reaching capacity too quickly.
The Jackery 500, by contrast, only features one AC outlet, which significantly limits simultaneous device usage and forces users to rely more on DC or USB outputs. Its 500W inverter is reliable for light usage—phones, laptops, cameras, lights—but isn’t suited to handle small kettles, mini-fridges, or induction-based devices.
Winner: Bluetti EB55
With higher output and quadruple the AC ports, the EB55 handles more diverse power needs without compromise.
Charging Speed and Solar Input Performance
The Bluetti EB55 accepts up to 200W of AC or solar input, recharging from 0 to 100% in as little as 3 hours. It uses an integrated MPPT charge controller, ensuring optimal solar performance even in partially cloudy conditions. The EB55 also supports dual input (AC + solar simultaneously), dramatically reducing charging time when both sources are available.
The Jackery Explorer 500 is limited to 100W of input, whether charging via wall or solar. A full recharge takes 7.5 hours with AC and often longer with solar, depending on environmental conditions. Jackery also lacks dual input support, making it less efficient during critical recharge windows.
Winner: Bluetti EB55
Bluetti charges faster, accepts higher solar input, and supports dual charging—making it significantly more versatile for off-grid and emergency use.

Ports and Output Variety
The Bluetti EB55 excels in connectivity with a broad selection of outputs. It includes four AC outlets, one 100W USB-C PD port, four USB-A ports, one 12V/10A car socket, two DC5521 ports, and a 15W wireless charging pad on top. Whether you’re charging a laptop, smartphone, drone, CPAP machine, or lighting system, Bluetti provides ample support for simultaneous charging.
In comparison, the Jackery Explorer 500 offers just one AC outlet, three USB-A ports, and one car port. It lacks USB-C, wireless charging, and any DC barrel connectors—limiting its usability for modern devices and more complex power setups.
Winner: Bluetti EB55
With more output ports, newer standards like USB-C, and wireless charging, Bluetti supports a wider range of real-world applications.
Portability and Weight
The Jackery Explorer 500 remains lighter at 6 kg (13.2 lbs) compared to the Bluetti EB55’s 7.5 kg (16.5 lbs). Its boxy form and ergonomic handle make it easy to carry and well-suited for users who prioritize simplicity and mobility, especially on short trips or for indoor emergency backup.
While heavier, the Bluetti EB55 is still quite portable and balances its added weight with more power, ports, and performance features. It’s ideal for vanlife, car camping, and off-grid situations where performance outweighs ultralight convenience.
Winner: Jackery Explorer 500
For users who need something lighter and simpler to move around, Jackery takes this category—though it does so with compromises in capability.
Smart Features and App Control
Neither the Jackery Explorer 500 nor the Bluetti EB55 includes smart features like Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or app integration. Both rely solely on onboard physical controls and LCD displays to monitor charge levels, input/output flow, and battery status.
Winner: Tie
Neither unit offers app control. Users looking for smart connectivity should consider newer models like the Bluetti EB3A or Jackery Explorer 300 Plus.
Quick Rundown Of Jackery Explorer 500
Quick Rundown Of Bluetti EB55
Conclusion
Choose Bluetti EB55 if you want a more powerful, durable, and versatile power station with faster charging, better output variety, and longer battery lifespan. It’s ideal for users with serious energy needs, off-grid campers, digital nomads, and those who need long-term reliability.
Choose Jackery Explorer 500 if you need a lightweight, simple solution for basic device charging and light-duty use, particularly for users who value portability and aren’t concerned with advanced features or high output.
Overall Winner: Bluetti EB55
With superior power output, faster recharging, longer battery life, and unmatched port versatility, the Bluetti EB55 is the more future-ready, high-performance choice for users who expect more from their mid-range portable power station.